Exxon shipping co v baker
WebJun 18, 2024 · Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 486 n.5 (2008) (citations and quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir. 2006) ("It should be noted that Rule 59(e) motions serve the limited function of correcting manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered … Webthe realities of the modern shipping industry. Captain Mitchell Stoller graduated as valedicto-rian from the California Maritime Academy. Captain Stoller worked for Exxon Shipping Company between 1975 and 1988, first as a third mate from 1975 to 1977, then as a second mate from 1977 to 1979, then as a first mate from 1979 to 1984, and finally …
Exxon shipping co v baker
Did you know?
WebSupreme Court cases preceding Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker at length, including BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore,5 as well as State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell.6 This Note argues against the imposition of a strict one-to-one maximum ratio of punitive-to-compensatory damages. In light of the varying application of Exxon Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court ruled in a 5-3 decision that the punitive damages awarded to the victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill should be reduced from $2.5 billion to $500 million. The case was appealed from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit had also ruled that Exxon could be held liable for the reckless conduct of the ship's captain, Joseph J. Hazelwood, …
WebExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, at 2618. USSC disagreed with Exxon’s argument that maritime common law should not allow punitive damages. The USSC developed a ratio to determine compensatory to punitive damages, thus, guiding lower courts in calculating punitives in cases with similar conduct concerns. Web1 Exxon Shipping Co v Baker, 128 S Ct 2605 (2008). 2 The compensatory damages reference point used by the U.S. Supreme Court is $507.5 million rather than the original $287 million verdict because the Court accepted the District Court’s calculation of the total compensatory damages. See id at 2605, 2622.
Web07-219 EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER DECISION BELOW: 490 F3d 1066 THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF Supreme Court Fellows - Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary ANYA KU, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts SAMUEL J. MERCHANT, U.S. Sentencing Commission JOHN L. … WebOne of Exxon’s arguments—that the jury was inappropriately allowed to consider its wealth—was procedural in character. See Brief for Petitioner at 55– 56, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008) (No. 07-219). But the Court ultimately declined to address the argument. See generally Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605 ...
Weba punitive damages/compensatory damages maximum ratio of 1.0 in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, which it viewed as an appropriate upper bound ratio for maritime oil spill cases.13 In her opinion that dissented in part, Justice Ginsburg hypothesized that the 1:1 ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages might have broader applicability in
WebJan 17, 2024 · Exxon Shipping Company v. Baker et al. Oyez U.S. Supreme Court Media Project. The Oyez Project is a collection of U.S. Supreme Court Media. The case is outlined, similar to the style of the Legal Information Institute, but also summarized for easy consumption by readers. The Oyez site also offers court transcripts, and recorded oral … malaysia fruitsWebExxon Shipping Company v. Baker Public Justice joined an amicus brief that urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject Exxon’s bid to evade full punishment for the harms caused by the wreck of the Exxon Valdez oil tanker in Alaska’s Prince William Sound in 1989. malaysia fruits drawingWebExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008) ..... 2, 24, 30 Federal Insurance Co. v. Keybank N.A., 340 Fed. App’x 5 (2d Cir. 2009) ..... 17 Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Great Ameri-can Insurance Co. of New York, 822 F.3d 620 malaysia fruit season chartWebExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis Law School Case Brief Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker - 554 U.S. 471, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008) Rule: A 1:1 ratio of compensatory-to-punitive damages is a fair upper limit in maritime tort cases. Facts: Oil spilled from a tanker. malaysia fta countriesWebJun 25, 2008 · June 25, 2008. The Supreme Court held that a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against Exxon was excessive as a matter of maritime common law, and limited the award to a 1:1 ratio of compensatory to punitive damages. In the ruling, the Court was equally divided on whether maritime law allows corporate liability for punitive damages … malaysia fruit seasonWebThe owner, petitioner Exxon Shipping Co. (now SeaRiver Maritime, Inc.), and its owner, petitioner Exxon Mobil Corp. (collectively, Exxon), have settled state and federal claims for environmental damage, with payments exceeding $1 billion, and this action by respondent Baker and others, including commercial fishermen and native Alaskans, was ... malaysia f\\u0026b companyWebJun 25, 2008 · The owner, petitioner Exxon Shipping Co. (now SeaRiver Maritime, Inc.), and its owner, petitioner Exxon Mobil Corp. (collectively, Exxon), have settled state and federal claims for environmental damage, with payments exceeding $1 billion, and this action by respondent Baker and others, including commercial fishermen and native … malaysia f\u0026b listed company